Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Watu Jaran Tanpa Kepala DiDesa Laren Kecamatan Bumiayu, Kabupaten BrebesBerdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2010 tentangCagar Budaya

Authors

  • Rafie Azhar Hibatullah Student at the Faculty of Law, Muhamadiyah University Purwokerto Author
  • Martiningsih Faculty of Law, Muhamadiyah University Purwokerto Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51921/wlr.cc3j6v35

Keywords:

Legal Protection, Cultural Conservation, Headless Watu Jaran.

Abstract

Abstract The Headless Watu Jaran is a historical site which is also a Suspected Cultural Heritage Object (ODCB)
which has not been designated as a Cultural Conservation located in Laren Village, Bumiayu District, Brebes
Regency. Law Number 10 of 2011 concerning Cultural Conservation guarantees legal certainty and protection for
OCBD. The formulation of the problem is what form of legal protection for cultural heritage in Brebes Regency
based on Law (UU) Number 11 of 2010 concerning cultural heritage and what are the obstacles in legal protection
of the Headless Watu Jaran in Laren Village, Bumiayu District, Brebes Regency. Normative juridical research with
descriptive-qualitative. Data source is secondary data. Primary legal materials include Law Number 11 of 2010,
Government Regulation Number 10 of 1993 and Brebes Regency Regional Regulation Number 10 of 2015. The data
collection techniques areobservation, interview and literature study. Research results: a) Law Number 11 of 2010
contains legal protection and legal certainty as well as Regional Regulation (Perda) of Brebes Regency Number 10
of 2015 concerning the Preservation and Management of Cultural Heritage and concrete efforts by the Government
of Laren Village, Bumiayu District, Brebes Regency in protecting and preserving cultural heritage includes,
Reporting on the discovery of Suspected Cultural Conservation Objects, care/maintenance, building
perimeter/barrier fences, socialization and optimization for various interests. b) Obstacles include a minimum
number of experts, regional performance is hampered because the Cultural Preservation Center is not optimal,
synergy between the central government, provincial government, district/city government and village government
and the community has not reached standards and there are still problems, legal sanctions have not been strictly
enforced.  

Downloads

Published

2023-12-10